11.kesäkuuta 2009
Competition
is good for you
Competition has many forms and it is not just sports
or some other situation where to see who wins. In business life co-operation or
good customer relationships are called somehow like win-win situation.
Obviously it is not so self-evident that we all have same conception about what
the competition is. It depends on situation. However, it is my argument that
there are many advantages when there is competition and it should be
financially aided.
It could be maintained that competition has many
disadvantages and it can be even unhealthy way to solve problems or
relationships. Firstly, it can be thought that there is no readiness to solve
these hypothetical problems if competition does not exist. So, competition is
the driving force to tackle problems that situation no competition has caused.
Secondly, there is always competition, which can be regressive or progressive.
Usually people prefer regressive one, as we can see when take a look on
economical situation.
Another argument against the competition is that it
enforces people to learn things. This argument proposes that people do not know
what is best for them. However, there is no understanding that this is
competition, they more likely feel it is regression. But, when competition is financially
aided, I mean rewarded, it is easier to accept these ideas that we need for competition.
Moreover, education rewards you by getting better knowledge and hopefully,
better income.
It could further be asserted that someone can drop out
if the competition is too hard or even unfair. This argument assumes that
social security system keeps the things going on, let the others compete. Usually
institutions who demand competition do not accept that they are dropped out,
like royal house in England or parliament, it is the same in Finland. But the
idea that people need them, keeps them doing good and constructive things. However,
competition keeps the tax rates in a decent level and private property out of
harm’s way. There are good indications that people prefer constitutional
protection of property.
Finally, I like to say that completion has to perform,
because it is the goal where these results are measured. There can be some
finishing points or more likely assessment interval where we can do some kind
of semi-valuation. How useful these semi-valuations are the question can be
answered. When reviewer has proficiency in criticism or unfairly criticizes the
evaluation result is quite a different. I have been thinking the rights and
obligations one individual (unit if we think enterprise, for example) has and
answer hasn’t found. At the same time when I am thinking they are grasping
prerogatives and keeping interest groups. However, competition contributes to
economical growth and fair income distribution. Secondly, competition is good
for you if it strengthens your professional competencies.
In conclusion, financial aid supporting competition is
important for the economic wellbeing of the whole nation. We have social
security system and many relevant ways to help or create opportunities to these
people who has no, in other aspects, similar possibilities to achieve the goal.
In a point of fact as long as stagnation takes place we are not able to
compete.
Ei kommentteja:
Lähetä kommentti