Competition
There are two claims to tackle out. Of course as an argumentative style we have to presume another one is appropriate. I have seen opinions that social skills are most relevant issue concerning working life. In my opinion we have to consider what competition as in fact is. So, it could be claimed that competition is good for you or that it does not do anybody any good.
Competition has many forms and it is not just sports or some other subject where to see who wins. In business life co-operation or good customer relationships are called somehow like win-win situation. Obviously it is not so self-evident that we all have same conception about what the competition is. However, it is my contention that there are many advantages when fair competition is in place. In this system the point is not just how competent you are, but also communication and networking skills takes place.
It could be maintained that competition has many disadvantages and it can be even unhealthy way to solve problems or relationships. Firstly, it can be thought that there is no readiness to solve these hypothetical problems if competition does not exist. So, competition is the driving force to tackle problems that situation no competition has caused. Secondly, there is always competition, which can be regressive or progressive. Usually people prefer regressive one, as we can see when take a look on economical situation.
Another argument against the competition is that it does not do anybody any good. This argument proposes that competition disturbs the state of affairs. However, society has many unsolved situations. The reason can be external or internal pressure. However, there is no understanding that this is competition, they more likely feel it is regression. Answer is that we may not tackle competition out. How this can be explained is that people don’t have self-confidence and they just pre-empt or even prevent to someone do something.
It could further be asserted that someone can drop out if the competition is too hard or even unfair. However, it can be said that competitors has need to evolve what they are doing. There is no understanding to that kind of vision. On the one hand if there is no place for completion we are not fulfilled what we are doing. If competition has aspects that someone has no opportunity to finish off what anyone is doing, there is no competition. That is not true, but the question is if the competition is fair. To clarify, competition is so difficult concept that I am not capable to condensate the structure of my thoughts in one or few words.
Finally, I like to say that completion has to perform, because it is the goal where these results are measured. There can be some finishing points or more likely assessment interval where we can do some kind of semi-valuation. How useful these semi-valuations are the question can be answered. When reviewer has proficiency in criticism or unfairly criticizes the evaluation result is quite a different. I have been thinking the rights and obligations one individual (unit if we think enterprise, for example) has and answer hasn’t found. At the same time when I am thinking they are grasping prerogatives and keeping interest groups.
In conclusion, competition is good for you if it is beneficial to your professional competencies. We have social security system and many relevant ways to help or create opportunities to these people who has no, in other aspects, similar possibilities to achieve the goal. In a point of fact as long as stagnation takes place we are not able to compete.